Sarah Palin had 8 words on her hand – Democrats feel it proves she is stupid

.

.

.

Former Governor of Alaska

Sarah Palin is catching ridicule

from the Liberal pundits because

she had seven or eight words

written in the palm of

her left hand.

.

___

.

The Democrats are sure this

proves Palin is an idiot who

can not form phrases or give

a speech without eight key words

to remind her what to say.

.

____

.

These are the same Democrats

who elected Barack Obama,

a man who can not ask for

a cup of coffee without a

teleprompter telling him

what to say.

.

.

Who sounds more stupid,

the person with eight key words

to remind them what to say,

or the person that is helpless

without their entire speech

written out for them word

for word and spoon fed to

them like a child?

.

.

.

.

.

.

_Obama Teleprompter LINKS

Will the real President

please stand up!

The secret team who

programs the teleprompter

(the real U.S. President)

and the handsome non thinking

spokesman (Obama) make

mistakes covered up by

the Liberal mainstream media!

Barack Obama proves he has

the brain power of a sock puppet

when his teleprompter

malfunctions,

and he speaks to the world

using his own brains and words!

President Teleprompter

was not on Jay Leno to tell

Sock Puppet Obama

what to say…

_________________________________________________________

_____CZAR OBAMA WITHOUT

______HIS TELEPROMPTER

.

.

.

Barack Obama Lovelorn – America Is Over It’s Obama Crush

.

.

.

.

Have you seen this man?

.

.

.

_have you seen this man?

The family and friends

of Albert (Al) Gore are

seeking information

on the whereabouts

of this man.

Albert was last seen

in the Washington

DC area shortly

before the city

was buried in

snow and ice.

Albert is known to

have disappeared

before during the

winter months only

to re-appear in hot

weather/summer.

1000 carbon credit

reward is offered

for information

on Alberts location.

.

.

.

Beware The Green Fascists

.

.

__Audi’s

Gorewellian

Super Bowl

___ad

Jonah Goldberg

_____February 9th, 2010

The L.A. Times

Audi’s Gorewellian Super Bowl ad

The automakers Green Police spot

drives home a disturbing notion about

environmentalism and the future.

I watched the Super Bowl

in the chilled air of the GFISZ

(that’s Goldberg Family Ice Station Zebra).

Here in Washington,

we haven’t seen this much

snow since at least 1922.

The blizzard of 2010 took

out our electricity for a day.

Digging out from “snowmaggedon” was

nothing less than an Augean challenge,

though my lower back is,

alas,

less than Herculean.

Meanwhile,

snow canceled my daughter’s 7th birthday

party Saturday and her school Monday.

We’re slated for another foot by Wednesday.

Suffice to say I’m not panicing

about Global Warming right now.

Perhaps that’s why I was bemused

and intrigued by Audi’s Super Bowl ad.

Audi’s “Green Police”

(available on YouTube)

depicts an America where citizens are

arrested — roughly —

for even minor environmental infractions.

A man at the supermarket asks for

a plastic shopping bag and has his head

slammed against the counter as he’s

cuffed by a Green Police officer.

“You picked the wrong day

to mess with the ecosystem,

plastic boy,”

quips the cop.

When officers find a battery in

the wrong suburban garbage bin,

one big cop yells,

“Battery!

Let’s go!

Take the house!”

It’s a fascinating commercial.

They even got Cheap Trick to rerecord

“Dream Police” as “Green Police” for

the soundtrack.

But just as the satire becomes enjoyable,

the message changes.

Until the pitch for Audi intrudes,

you’d think it was a fun parody

from a right-wing free-market outfit

about the pending dystopian

environmental police state.

.

.

.

.

The pitch involves an

“eco roadblock.”

A young man driving an Audi A3 TDI

is singled out by an inspector.

“We’ve got a TDI here,”

he says.

“Clean diesel,”

he adds approvingly.

“You’re good to go, sir,”

the cops inform the driver.

The smiling Audi owner accelerates

to happiness on the open road.

The screen fades to black

and the tagline appears —

“Green has never felt so right.”

So,

instead of some healthy

don’t-tread-on-me mockery,

the moral of the story is that we should

welcome our new green overlords and,

if we know what’s good for us,

surrender to the New Green Order.

Some eco-bloggers disliked the ad

because it reinforces the association

of undemocratic statism or PC bullying

with environmentalism.

Perhaps that’s why the

New York Times dubbed it “misguided.”

Meanwhile,

some conservatives didn’t like it

because it makes light of what they

believe is actually happening.

After all,

in America and Europe,

the list of environmental crimes is

growing at an almost exponential rate.

The ad is absurd,

of course,

but not nearly as absurd as Audi thinks.

What was Audi’s intent?

Presumably,

to sell cars.

“The ad only makes sense if it’s

aimed at people who acknowledge

the moral authority of the green police,”

writes Grist magazine’s David Roberts

on the Huffington Post.

The target audience,

according to Roberts,

are men who want to

“do the right thing.”

He’s certainly right that

the ad isn’t aimed at people

(whom he childishly mocks as “teabaggers”)

who worry that their liberties

are being slowly eroded.

.

.

.

But the message is hardly

“do the right thing.”

To me,

the target demographic is a certain

subset of spineless upscale white men

(all of the perps in the ad

are affluent white guys)

who just want to go with the flow.

In that sense,

the Audi ad has a lot in common with

those execrable MasterCard commercials.

Targeting the same demographic,

those ads depicted hapless fathers

being harangued by their children

to get with the environmental program.

MasterCard’s tagline:

“Helping Dad become a better man:

Priceless.”

The difference is that

MasterCard’s ads were earnest,

creepy,

diabetes-inducing treacle.

Audi’s ad not only fails to invest

the greens with moral authority,

it concedes that the carbon cops

are out of control,

unjustly bullying people and power-hungry

(in a postscript scene,

the Green Police pull over real cops

for using Styrofoam cups).

But, because resistance is futile

when it comes to the eco-borg,

you might as well get the best car you can.

It will be interesting to see

whether the ad actually sells cars.

The premise only works if you take it

as a given that this Gorewellian nightmare

is inevitable.

But the commercials arrive at

precisely the moment when that

inevitability is unraveling like an

old pair of hemp socks.

.

.

.

The global warming industry is

imploding from scientific scandals,

inconvenient weather,

economic anxiety and surging

popular skepticism

(according to a Pew Research Center

survey released in January,

global warming ranks 21st out of

21 in terms of the public’s priorities).

Personally,

this week,

I don’t want a car to get

past the Green Gestapo.

I’m looking for something that

can power through the frozen tundra

separating me from the supermarket.

jgoldberg@latimes

columnists.com

.

.

.

.

._Green Police video LINK

._Green Police:Super Bowl Ad

.

.

Roamin’ Gnome Home

.

.

 

__There’s no

__place like

__gnome

 

_______February 9th, 2010

Belefast Telegraph

BELEFASTELEGRAPH.CO.UK

 

A mystery thief who stole a treasured

gnome from a garden 13 years ago

has finally apologised and provided

a replacement,

the gnome’s owners said.

Denis and Doris Heard lost the gnome

from their garden in Leeds in 1996

and were later teased when they

received a postcard from the little chap,

who was apparently in Devon.

Now,

after more than a decade,

the gnome-napper has given in to

his conscience and left a letter of

apology along with a replacement.

The anonymous thief said he and a

friend took the memento as a

Mischief Night prank.

He said in the note:

“Since growing up and having

a garden of my own that I cherish

and care for,

I feel really bad about taking

something from you and your garden.

“I hope you will accept my

apologies and a replacement gnome!

Kind wishes.”

.

______

.

Keen gardener Mr Heard, 78,

said he and his wife had given up

hope of ever hearing about their

gnome again.

He told the Yorkshire Evening Post:

“There was a parcel on the doorstep.

We opened it and it was a gnome

with a rake –

very like the one that went missing.

“We’d just like to say ‘thank you’ to

whoever it was for returning the gnome.”

Mr and Mrs Heard’s gnome

went missing during a nationwide

spate of gnome mysteries in the

mid 1990s when a series of them

disappeared only to later bombard

their owners with messages from

around the world.

 

_._Proof Gnomes take a whizz

.

.

Obama Is a Bold Faced Liar (Part ONE of TWO)

.

.

.

.

From Camelot

to Scamalot

By Jim Gulrard

.

_____January 30th, 2010

.

American Thinker

.

AMERICANTHINKER.COM

From Camelot to Scamalot

.

__PART ONE OF TWO

For almost half a century, the romantic and noble label of John and Jackie Kennedy’s “Camelot” years in the White House has been an integral part of our political lexicon — and a major asset to the once-liberal, now mostly left-illiberal Democratic National Party.

How ironic it is that in the late JFK’s own state of Massachusetts, the voters who elected Republican State Senator Scott Brown to the U.S. Senate have laid the predicate for yet another presidential legacy label: the highly ignoble “Scamalot” for the unfolding political lives of Barack Obama and his far-left entourage.

Faced with so many false assurances, exaggerated ”hopes,” and inflated assertions about not only Obama’s health care takeover, but also his radical policies on energy, taxes, the national debt, unemployment, the environment, and the ongoing War on Terror, Bay State voters came to believe that the president is simply deceiving them — to the point that they were routinely thinking, ”You lie.”

But using the somewhat softer term of “scam,” let us paint a full picture of what is going on here. Let us pose the tough question: “Does this charismatic, smooth-talking, and openly ”progressive” (i.e., socialist) President Obama scam just a little, or does he truly scam a lot?” Consider, for example,

SCAM #1 –

He loudly asserts complete ”transparency,” but there is little or none — e.g., his birthplace records, his Marxist parentage and upbringing, his school records from grammar to graduate, his passport records, his radical-left personal and professional associations, his deep association with the ACORN conspiracy, his Harvard Law Review and book-writing records, and his multiple far-left, non-vetted, unconfirmed, and largely unaccountable regulatory “czars.”

SCAM #2 –

He continues to assure “bipartisanship” and “accountability,” but there is little of either, with most of his “economic stimulus” legislation and “TARP” funding — and now the health care proposals — crafted behind closed doors and with all of the Republicans (and all centrist and conservative Democrats, as well) actually locked out.

NOTE:

Massachusetts voters seem to have decided that “BUYpartisanship” might be a better spelling for the blatant vote-buying of several Senate Democrats (and probably as many House Democrats, as well) who are so servile as to be for sale.

SCAM #3 –

He promises not to sign any health care bill which “adds a single dime to the deficit” — but he deceitfully front-loads taxes and back-loads benefits to make it seem so, and he contrives multiple “scoring” schemes which grossly underestimate hidden costs by trillions of such “single dimes.”

SCAM #4 –

He pledges not to raise the taxes of anyone who earns less than such-and-suchamount – a number which keeps getting smaller and smaller – and cynically labels $250-”stimulus” handouts as ”tax cuts for 95 percent of all taxpayers.”

SCAM #5 –

He has assured that there would no role (or positions of substantial influence) for “lobbyists” in his administration, but he has made so many exceptions and end-runs as to render the original pledge a prima facie lie. (Surely, SEIU President Andy Stern, who virtually lives in the White House, would never “lobby” the president on anything.)

SCAM #6 –

He pretends to have left the Liberation Theology church when he has merely distanced himself from a particularly radical minister — while then appointing that minister’s hand-picked and equally radical successor, Rev. Cecil Morris, to his Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Initiatives. Further, he has appointed a Cuban expatriate Liberation Theologytheologian, Professor Miguel Diaz, as his ambassador to the Vatican.

 

.

.

“If you tell a big enough lie

and tell it frequently enough,

it will be believed.”

Adolph Hitler

“The victor will never be

asked if he told the truth.”

Adolph Hitler

“It is not truth that matters,

but victory.”

Adolph Hitler

“The great masses of the

people will more easily fall

victims to a big lie than

to a small one.”

Adolph Hitler

“What good fortune for

governments that the

people do not think.”

Adolph Hitler

 

.

.

_Saul Alinsky links in GREEN

____Barack Obama plays by Saul

____Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals!

____Barack Obama the Saul Alinsky ruler!

____(Part ONE of TWO)

____Barack Obama the Saul Alinsky ruler!

____(Part TWO of TWO)

____Emperor Obama’s Rules For

____Radical takeover of America!

____Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton

____were both Saul Alinsky disciples!

____Emperor Obama:

____Alinski Agent Destroying America!

____Marxist Saul Alinsky

____was Barack Obama’s mentor

____from beyond the grave!

 

 

.

.

.

.

Obama Is a Bold Faced Liar (Part TWO of TWO)

.

.

.

From Camelot

to Scamalot

By Jim Gulrard

.

_____January 30th, 2010

American Thinker

.

AMERICANTHINKER.COM

From Camelot to Scamalot

.

__PART TWO OF TWO

 

SCAM #7 –

He claims not to be a socialist, but a “progressive” instead — when the latter has long been the radical left’s codeword for the former, and even when such “Death to America” socialists and communists as Fidel Castro, Hugo Chávez, and Daniel Ortega proudly claim the “progressive” label as well.

SCAM #8 –

He talks of “energy independence” but proposes multilayered policies of Less Energy at Higher Prices (LEAHP) — all of which are devoted to a ruinously low “carbon footprint” belief system which is itself a pseudo-religious scam, correctly being called by many the Branch Carbonian Cult.

SCAM #9 –

He embraces as “scientific consensus” the junk science of anthropogenic global warming (AGW) and shamelessly rejects virtually all scientific evidence (re: solar cycles, cosmic winds, ocean currents, volcanic activity, etc.) to the contrary, just as the pseudo-scientific Branch Carbonians do.

SCAM #10 –

He promises “jobs, jobs, jobs” while he relentlessly proposes — in an apparent state of cognitive dissonance — both the proactive outforcing of jobs and capital investment and the determined downforcing of most major domestic energy supplies.

SCAM #11 –

He repeatedly blames the ever-exploding budget deficits and the unending loss of jobs on “the Bush economy we inherited” — when it was clearly the Pelosi-Reid Congressional Economy of 2007-08 (with its promises of higher taxes and of radical “carbon-footprint” crackdowns) that he inherited, which had already ended the de facto Bush Boom of the preceding three years, 2004-06.

SCAM #12 —

He cynically relabels global terrorism a “man-caused disaster” and redefines al-Qaeda-inspired and trained enemy combatants as mere Miranda-protected “criminals” — and thereby tries to insulate himself and his legacy from ever having “lost a war,” which, after all, was never a war in the first place.

Topping it all, he and his dedicated fellow progressives will continue in the media, in academia, and elsewhere to muddle the truth about all of the major scams listed above — plus provide false or flippantly unreliable promises to end earmarking, to reduce deficit spending, to close Gitmo, to end corruption in high places, ad infinitum.

And they will do this by a wide variety of deceptive tactics, many of which come mainly from the late, great Marxist tactician of community organizing, Saul Alinsky, and his infamous Rules for Radicals handbook — which the young Barack actually taught to fellow radicals in both classroom and streetwise, ACORN-style settings.

And so it is that Barack Obama’s Scamalot army marches onward. As the French always say,”Plus ça change, plus c’est la meme chose.” In this case, it will be the same old Big Brother dream of world socialism — and it will remain so until we are finally able to flush the electoral toilets all across the nation later this year and again in 2012, as has so appropriately just happened in Massachusetts.

_____________________________________

A D.C.-area attorney and

national security strategist,

Jim Guirard was longtime

Chief of Staff to former U.S.

Senators Allen Ellender and

Russell Long.

His TrueSpeak.org website

focuses on truth-in-language

and truth-in-history

in public discourse.

.

.

“If you tell a big enough lie

and tell it frequently enough,

it will be believed.”

Adolph Hitler

“The victor will never be

asked if he told the truth.”

Adolph Hitler

“It is not truth that matters,

but victory.”

Adolph Hitler

“The great masses of the

people will more easily fall

victims to a big lie than

to a small one.”

Adolph Hitler

“What good fortune for

governments that the

people do not think.”

Adolph Hitler

.

.

_Saul Alinsky links in GREEN

____Barack Obama plays by Saul

____Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals!

____Barack Obama the Saul Alinsky ruler!

____(Part ONE of TWO)

____Barack Obama the Saul Alinsky ruler!

____(Part TWO of TWO)

____Emperor Obama’s Rules For

____Radical takeover of America!

____Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton

____were both Saul Alinsky disciples!

____Emperor Obama:

____Alinski Agent Destroying America!

____Marxist Saul Alinsky

____was Barack Obama’s mentor

____from beyond the grave!

 

.

.

.

Obama is The Master at winning his own Straw Man Arguments

.

.

.

____Etymology of the

Straw Man Argument

“Straw Man” is one of

the best-named fallacies,

because it is memorable

and vividly illustrates the

nature of the fallacy.

Imagine a fight in which

one of the combatants

sets up a man of straw,

attacks it,

then proclaims victory.

All the while,

the real opponent

stands by untouched.

.

.

Matthews and

Olbermann now

openly fighting

over Obama

By Ann Coulter

.

.

______February 3rd, 2010

ANNCOULTER.COM

OPENLY FIGHTING OVER OBAMA

.

“Special Report” on the President’s

question-and-answer session with

Republicans last Friday,

MSNBC’s jock-sniffers Chris Matthews,

Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow

produced a museum-quality show:

.

___________

.

___________________

.

MATTHEWS:

Everybody agrees he could

handle everything today. …

OLBERMANN:

It almost felt like watching

the stories of John L. Sullivan,

the 19th-century boxer,

who would volunteer to fight anybody

and everybody in the house and

knock them all out. …

MADDOW

(imagining Obama thinking):

You’ve brought a pet issue here,

congressman,

who is the ranking member

of the Budget Committee,

let me tell you 400,000 things about it,

and invite you to continue the

discussion with me later. …

MATTHEWS:

Today showed me that we do produce

probably the best candidate and best

president we can in this system you

can imagine in the world. …

OLBERMANN:

They had 140 players on the field

and the other team had one guy

and they lost to him…

MATTHEWS:

You were so unbelievably hot,

Mr. President!

You blew away the other team!

OBAMA:

Beat it.

MATTHEWS:

OK,

I’ll go stand in my locker now.

.

.

Unlike the jock-sniffers,

normal people watching the president’s

tete-a-tete with the Republicans only

wondered why Obama always responds

to imaginary arguments no one made,

rather than the questions

actually being asked.

That is Obama’s signature move:

Invent “people” who are “saying”

ridiculous things and then encourage

the audience to laugh at

these made-up buffoons.

Since Obama’s reformulations of

Republican arguments are always absurd,

no further response from him

is necessary —

and none is ever forthcoming.

thus,

for example,

Obama’s description of Republican

criticism of his plan to nationalize

health care was that

“this thing was some Bolshevik plot.”

No.

No one said it was a “plot,”

Bolshevik or otherwise.

Republicans’ objection to national

health care could be more accurately

portrayed as follows:

Obama’s plan

to nationalize health care was a

terrible idea because it would turn

over one-sixth of the American

economy to Washington bureaucrats,

who would run the system as

competently as the federal government

runs everything else,

from airport security to

the post office to FEMA.

How about responding

to that argument?

(And as long as Obama brought it up,

can he explain which part of national

health care the Bolsheviks would

have objected to most strongly?)

This isn’t how adults

conduct serious political debates;

it’s how children argue

with their parents.

Don’t have a cow!

Liberals hide conservative arguments

from the public like teenagers hide

contraband from mother under the bed.

Repeatedly positing imaginary attacks

by Republicans accusing him of a “plot,”

Obama said that

“the way these issues are being

presented by the Republicans is

that this is some wild-eyed plot

to impose huge government in

every aspect of our lives.”

Again,

not a “plot” and certainly not

“wild-eyed.”

The only person accusing anyone

of “plotting” here is Obama accusing

the GOP of plotting against him.

I guess they don’t teach

irony at Harvard Law School.

If Obama is going to keep imagining

others accusing him of “plots,”

could he provide just one example?

Republicans also did not

accuse Obama of trying to

“impose huge government in

every aspect of our lives.”

Just the part of it that

determines how long we get to live.

.

.

Continuing his fantasy battle

with imaginary opponents,

Obama said,

“What you’ve been telling

your constituents is,

this guy is doing all kinds

of crazy stuff that’s going

to destroy America.”

I gather Obama is incapable of

responding to his opponents’

actual argument,

which is that he is proposing

all sorts of things that would

be very bad for America.

Since he pleads innocence only

on the claim that he is doing

“crazy stuff that’s going

to destroy America” —

an argument no one made —

apparently he’s guilty as charged

on the claim that he’s merely doing

very bad things to America.

Adopting the pose of

limpid nonpartisanship,

Obama repeatedly accused Republicans

of horrible things using his peculiar

straw-man technique.

.

.

.

He told Republicans he was

“absolutely committed”

to working with them,

“but it can’t just be political

assertions that aren’t substantiated.”

Can Obama please name a single

“unsubstantiated” political assertion

by a Republican before wasting

everyone’s time by instructing

Republicans to stop making them?

I can name a few from Obama!

How about the whopper he told

about national health care not

covering illegal aliens?

Or the one about it

not covering abortions?

Weeks after Obama made those

unsubstantiated political assertions

before a joint session of Congress,

Democrats were in death-match

battles with Republicans

(and some moderate Democrats)

who tried to exclude coverage for

illegals and abortion from the very

bills Obama said never contained

such coverage in the first place.

How about Obama’s claim in

his State of the Union address

last week that a recent Supreme Court

ruling would allow

“foreign corporations to spend

without limit in our elections”?

In the case Obama mentioned,

the court overruled section 441a

of the campaign-finance law,

which had banned all corporate

spending on elections.

The case did not concern,

nor did the court address,

section 441e,

which prohibits foreign corporations

from making any “contribution or

donation of money or other

thing of value …

in connection with a Federal,

State or local election.”

.

_______

.

History will record that these

remarks from his State of the Union

address were the only case legendary

barrister Barack Obama ever argued

before the Supreme Court.

And he lost.

Even when presented with a short,

straightforward,

simply stated question

by Rep. Mike Pence,

Obama couldn’t help but to

formulate a different question.

Pence asked:

“Mr. President,

will you consider supporting

across-the-board tax relief,

as President Kennedy did?”

The question Obama

wanted Pence to ask was:

Mr. President,

will you join Republicans in

cutting taxes of billionaires?

Luckily,

Obama’s reformulation gave him

an opening for a killer answer:

“What you may consider

across-the-board tax cuts could be,

for example,

greater tax cuts for people who

are making a billion dollars.

I may not agree to a

tax cut for Warren Buffett.”

Republicans should take that answer

and run like a thief in the night!

OK,

let’s cut taxes on everyone

except billionaires.

I’d even support a specific tax

expressly on Warren Buffett.

Now, son,

how much will you give

us for these magic beans?

If only Republicans could maneuver

Obama into answering a question

on abortion,

we could probably get him to

agree to ban all abortions ––

except in the case of teenage girls

who have been raped by their fathers.

(This is how I assume Obama

would rephrase the question.)

No conservative argues like this.

To the contrary,

we’re morose that Nexis

archives are not more complete,

so we can’t quote liberals

directly more often.

.

.

.

__

.

.

Sri Lanka local fashions faboo fotos!

.

.

.

__Models

display local

designs at a

fashion show

_in Colombo,

__capital of

__Sri Lanka,

_Feb. 7, 2010

____(Xinhua/AFP Photos)

_______CHINAVIEW

.

.

.

.

.

Sacha Baron Cohen “outed” sharing hotel rooms with a famous gay Austrian fashion reporter!

.

.

.

A rep for Sacha Baron Cohen

has dismissed reports the

Borat funny man will wed

fiancee Isla Fisher

later this month,

WENN reports February

7th, 2010.

.

.

Tabloid reports over the

weekend claimed the Hollywood

couple plans to exchange vows

on 26 February and has already

sent out invitations to close

friends and family.

.

.

The Confessions of a Shopaholic

star recently admitted she and

Cohen didn’t have time to plan

their nuptials since becoming

parents to daughter Olive

in 2007.

.

.

But a spokesperson for Cohen

insists the planned bash isn’t

a wedding –

it’s a celebration

of a Jewish holiday.

.

.

The rep tells GossipCop.com,

“They’re having a Purim party.

That is all.”

_______________________________________

._____Bruno caught on camera!!!

____THE STORY

BEHIND THE STORY!

22MOON does not make it

a habit to “out” celebrities

who are secretly “gay”.

but Isla Fisher needs to

know something about

Sacha Baron Cohen

that Rash Manly’s

Hollywood contacts have

been telling him for a year.

.

.

The openly GAY Austrian

fashion reporter BRUNO

has been photographed

going into and out of

Sacha Baron Cohen’s

hotel rooms at all hours

all over the globe!

.

.

Though the pair are sly

enough never to be

photographed together,

what other explanation

can there be for Bruno

and Sasha sharing the

same hotel rooms -

HELLO!

.

.

Sorry to break your

heart Ms. Fisher but

you needed to hear

the truth.

____Rash Manly

.

.

.

.

.

.

.